The typical agency pitch process has a fundamental design flaw: it evaluates agencies primarily on their ability to present, not their ability to deliver. Agencies optimise for pitches. They put their most experienced people in the room, their most impressive work on the screen, and their most compelling narrative in the presentation. None of this tells you much about what it's like to actually work with them.
The pitches that surface the best agency partners do two things differently: they create conditions that reveal how an agency thinks, not just what they've done; and they test the actual working relationship, not just the agency's presentation skills.
Step 1: Write a genuine brief, not a capabilities request. Send the same brief to all agencies. It should describe a real business challenge — not "tell us about your capabilities" — and ask for a specific strategic response. The brief itself should test whether agencies read carefully and respond specifically.
Step 2: Shortlist three agencies maximum. More than three wastes everyone's time — yours and theirs. Base the shortlist on: relevant sector experience, portfolio quality, size fit, and initial chemistry from a screening call.
Step 3: Give agencies adequate preparation time. Two weeks is the minimum for a properly considered strategic response. Pitches called with one week's notice produce generic responses from agencies filling in a template, not genuine strategic thinking.
Step 4: Ask hard questions in the room. What would you change about our current marketing right now? Walk us through a campaign that failed and what you learned. Who will actually work on our account day to day? What do you wish clients understood about working with agencies?
Step 5: Run a paid strategy session before committing. The best agencies will welcome a paid session — typically $2,000–5,000 — where they work with your team on a real problem before you commit to a retainer. Agencies that resist this are worth scrutinising.
| Criterion | Weight | How to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic thinking | 35% | Quality of response to the brief; depth of market understanding |
| Relevant experience | 25% | Specific sector and deliverable examples with outcomes |
| Team quality | 20% | Seniority and calibre of day-to-day team, not just pitch team |
| Cultural fit | 15% | Communication style, values alignment, working style |
| Commercial terms | 5% | Pricing transparency, contract fairness, flexibility |
Selecting on price. The agency that quotes lowest is almost never the best choice. The price of poor agency work — in wasted budget, lost opportunity, and the cost of switching — far exceeds any saving on the monthly retainer.
Not checking references. Speak to two or three current or recent clients of any agency you're seriously considering. Ask specifically about the day-to-day experience, how they handle conflict, and what they'd do differently. References almost always reveal something the pitch didn't.
Not involving the people who'll manage the relationship. The decision-maker in the pitch should not be the only person who evaluates the agency. The team member who'll manage the relationship day to day should have significant input — because they'll be living with the outcome.
Yes, for pitches that require significant strategic work. An unpaid pitch for a 12-month retainer worth $150,000+ is asking agencies to invest significant resources with no guarantee of return. The agencies that can afford to do this free are the large ones for whom the cost is negligible — not the specialist boutiques that are often the better choice. A $2,000–5,000 paid pitch fee attracts better responses from better agencies.
4–6 weeks from brief to decision is ideal. Shorter risks rushing a decision that will affect your business for 12+ months. Longer loses momentum and sends a signal to agencies that you're not serious about moving forward.